Although there is limited data on specific artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) other than artemether-lumefantrine, the other ACTs (including artesunate-amodiaquine, artesunate-mefloquine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine but not artesunate–sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine) may be considered for use where artemether-lumefantrine is not available, given the demonstrated poorer outcomes of quinine treatment, along with the challenges of adherence to a seven-day course of treatment.
ACTs are already recommended for treatment in second and third trimesters. This study, the largest of its kind, was a collaborative effort between over 20 research groups with data from over 34,000 pregnancies from 12 cohort studies in ten countries collected over more than 20 years.
Malaria in pregnancy has devastating consequences for both mother and fetus, requiring prompt and effective treatment. The risk of infection is highest in the first trimester when many pregnancies are yet to be protected by chemoprevention with intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) which begins in the second trimester. Up until now, ACTs were recommended by the WHO as first-line treatment in all patient groups, except in first-trimester women, for whom quinine with clindamycin has been recommended due to concerns about the potential embryotoxicity of artemisinins.
The meta-analysis results suggest that first-trimester treatment with artemisinin-based treatment is as safe and possibly more effective than non-artemisinin-based treatments, including quinine-based regimens. Importantly, artemether-lumefantrine, the ACT with the most safety data, was associated with 42% fewer adverse pregnancy outcomes (pregnancy loss or major congenital malformations) than oral quinine in the first trimester.
Dr Stephanie Dellicour, Principal Research Associate at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, said: “The results of this meta-analysis are very reassuring as studies have shown that many women are already being exposed to first-line ACT treatment in early pregnancy in malaria-endemic countries. This is partly due to a lack of awareness of pregnancy status by the patients or healthcare providers at the time of treatment and the fact that quinine and clindamycin are largely unavailable in health facilities in eastern and southern Africa.“
Dr Makoto Saito, Assistant Professor at The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo and part of the WorldWide Antimalarial Research Network, said: “At WWARN, we have previously shown that ACTs have a superior efficacy and much better tolerability and lower transmission risk after treatment than quinine. This new study provides an update on a previous study, confirming the evidence on safety in the first trimester using all the currently available clinical data.
“This study provides strong evidence to policy makers that ACTs should replace quinine-based regimens as the preferred treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria for everybody, including pregnant women in their first trimester.”
All participating research groups kindly agreed to share their individual patient data (IPD) of 34,178 pregnancies with WWARN. The data included 737 pregnancies with confirmed first-trimester exposure to artemisinin-based treatment and 1,076 with confirmed exposure to other antimalarials. It has taken over 20 years to collect these data, illustrating the difficulty of obtaining quality data on the safety of antimalarials in pregnancy.
Dr Dellicour added: “Going forward, innovative strategies are needed to fast-track robust evidence generation to support informed decisions on treatment in pregnant women by policy makers, healthcare providers and patients and ensure that this high-risk group has access to the best antimalarial treatment in a timely manner.”
This research was funded by the Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), the World Health Organization, and the Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Read the full paper, Pregnancy outcomes after first-trimester treatment with artemisinin derivatives versus non-artemisinin antimalarials: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis, here.
* The WHO has updated their guidelines on the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in the first trimester (MagicApplink see section 22.214.171.124.1 Pregnant and lactating women):
Since 2009, the WorldWide Antimalarial Research Network (WWARN) has generated innovative tools and reliable evidence to inform the malaria community on the factors affecting the efficacy of antimalarial medicines. In the field of poverty-related infectious diseases, data are scarce and scattered across institutions around the world. WWARN collates and standardises anonymised individual patient data (IPD) from many trials and studies conducted across endemic regions so that they can then be harmonised and analysed as a single dataset, increasing the statistical power needed to answer key questions in malaria research.
Part of the Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), WWARN’s repository holds over 200k IPD and shares the resulting evidence widely to inform both policymakers and future researchers globally to continually advance knowledge and build capacity for evidence-based practice. Find out more at email@example.com.
The Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM) is a higher education institution with degree awarding powers and a registered charity in Liverpool, United Kingdom. Established in 1898, it was the first institution in the world dedicated to research and teaching tropical medicine. LSTM is a leading global research institute with well-established African networks and leads numerous international consortia and product development partnerships aimed at reducing or eliminating the impact of diseases upon the world's poorest people.